this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
760 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
76820 readers
1686 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i have a simple question... who the fuck asked for this?
Shareholders
Funny thing is that is not likely. The shareholders of microsoft (and most blue chip companies) have not really asked for anything other then endless profits lately. This endless drive into shit seems to be almost entirely driven by weird sales pitches and executives chasing a sunk cost.
The general idea is that whoever left behind in AI tech will vanish or lose power the next decade. Like Yahoo and other companies during the 2010+. So Google, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft compete now and they don't care about users. Their focus is enterprise market and the future domination.
Shareholders of Microsoft push AI.
Competitor Shareholders push AI.
Shareholders of hardware push AI.
Enterprise pushes AI.
"Innovation" is part of profit.
Ha, like 5% of the time. Most of the time its cluster fuck after cluster fuck and visits from the good idea fairies.
Not saying there should not be innovation, but innovation for nothing but to be able to say you are doing innovation is a cancer.
Yes, that's why I wrote "innovation" and not innovation. I'm not sure if there's something that better communicates the Dr. Evil air quotes.
That's just a longer way to say, yes, the shareholders asked for it.
Just because they didn't ask it in letter form or explicitely that doesn't mean much.
Look, if M$ does this 'agentic' move and its shares drop 20% overnight, then, and only THEN, you'd be right to say the shareholders did not ask for it.
Are shareholders punishing or rewarding these moves?
No, no they did not. They just said nothing, and execs took that to mean what ever they want. As is tradition.
You didn't read my message.
I did, and just think its bullshit. Investors have to invest, where would they put it if not in "safe" companies like microsoft?
Its total shit talk to put words and intent into a group of people and funds. They don't care, they just have money to park and Microsoft is seen as a safe place with a good return. There has been too much invested in this shit for them to change course, but also no alternative to invest in.
Billionaires, looking for more mass control.
It is not for our benefit.