this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
280 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

76839 readers
1479 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Passkeys are built on the FIDO2 standard (CTAP2 + WebAuthn standards). They remove the shared secret, stop phishing at the source, and make credential-stuffing useless.

But adoption is still low, and interoperability between Apple, Google, and Microsoft isn’t seamless.

I broke down how passkeys work, their strengths, and what’s still missing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] needanke@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How do you currently store your passwords? I would also consider that a third party with an adittional atack surface if you are considering the passkey location one.

Also your argument

(if you ignore the operating system, web browser, network protocols, etc., but that's part of using the tech).

is faulty. That is because passkeys exist in part to mitigate those atack vectors. Mitm, a compromised browser or client, etc. is less of an issue with passkeys. The information transmitted during an authentication can not be reused on another authentication attempt.

I don't agree on passkeys complicating things either. For me the authentication-flow is not more complicated then KeePasses autofill.

Assuming one can be 'tech savy' enough to not fall for fishing is bad. There are quite advanced attacks or you might even just be tired one day and do something stupid by accident.

What's that now? The weak point is the user's ability to implement MFA and biometrics? The same users who couldn't be bothered to create different passwords for different sites?

You don't expext the user to 'implement' mfa or biometrics. You expect them to use it. And most places where a novice would store passkeys don't just expect but enforce it. It is also way simpler to set up biometrics on one device compared to keeping with a good password strategy.