this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
1676 points (99.8% liked)

politics

26268 readers
4601 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zohran Mamdani has won the race for New York City mayor, according to Decision Desk HQ, ushering in a new era of progressive politics in the city and reigniting the debate over the Democratic Party’s future.

Mamdani, a 34-year-old democratic socialist, is poised to become the first millennial and first Muslim to lead New York City, after a campaign that pulled off one of the most stunning political upsets in recent memory. He defeated former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who mounted a long-shot independent bid after losing to Mamdani in the Democratic primary, and Republican Curtis Sliwa in his bid to succeed Mayor Eric Adams.

Mamdani focused heavily on affordability, pledging to freeze rent, establish city-owned grocery stores and make buses free for riders. He quickly became a progressive icon as well as a polarizing figure within the party over his positions, so much so that it divided prominent New York Democratic leadership over whether to endorse him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 59 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

The first thing my conservative acquaintance wrote was "I hope you re ready for another 9-11" because now its coming" They are really scared eh

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 40 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yet conservatives get mad about Kirk jokes and wonder why they get kicked off platforms.

[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Or just jail them even when quoting their supreme pedo leader.

(Probably not the best source link but a quick search will surely find more)

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So in conservative brain damaged logic, Giuliani was a Muslim, Socialist Democrat somehow responsible for 9/11.

You need better acquaintances.

[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

This was my comparable train of thought.. Giuliana was elected so 9-11 could happen! He is fully responsible no? /s

[–] Therobohour@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

Is that a threat?

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Did you ask them why they think that would cause it?

[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

That would be because of photos with the Imam Siraj Wahhaj.. Who according to conservatives was organizer of the 1993 wtc bombing.. but was not indicted or convicted of anything related to it.

[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, this is a personal 9/11 for every conservative piss baby who lives in an imaginary world where every paranoid delusion they have about Mamdani is real.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

They don't even think of New York City as "real America" in the first place. Connecting this to where 9/11 actually happened doesn't occur to them.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space -5 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Why do you have conservative acquaintances?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 25 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Because thats what adults do, they are capable of communicating and being near people with different values and opinions.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

"if there’s a Nazi at the table and 10 other people sitting there talking to him, you got a table with 11 Nazis."

The "acquaintance" needs a punch in the fucking face and a goodbye.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

You do realize that having witty quotes doesnt change anything right? It might be rhetorically effective at face value, but there is no value other than hate at display here.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If hating nazis is wrong, I don't want to be right

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not every conservative is a MAGA cultist nor a nazi, it’s ok to have friends and acquaintances with different political views and belief systems from yourself. You’re doing the “everyone I disagree with is a nazi” thing.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Not every conservative is a MAGA cultist nor a nazi,

Never said they were.

it’s ok to have friends and acquaintances with different political views and belief systems from yourself

Unless their beliefs say that others are lesser, or wrong, like LGBTQ people shouldn't exist.

You’re doing the “everyone I disagree with is a nazi” thing.

Really not though, not sure how you think that is the case

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Good, because I fucking hate nazis. Do you?

[–] blackwateropeth@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Demonizing people “not like us” is exactly how we got Trump. Not every conservative is a racist monster, most of them are just confused, or heavily gaslit from years of Fox News style propaganda. I’ve personally got a few of my conservative friends and family to see the problems with Donnie Cheeto and openly rebuke his decision making. “Punching someone in the face” for making a poor choice isn’t going to do shit for us when shit gets real, changing their minds will. Not saying everyone on that side of the fence is clear, and I sure as hell hope people complicit with these horrific ice raids etc get locked the fuck up for a long time. Same with all of trumps lap dogs.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, at this point there's no excuses. If you're uninformed today, it's malicious. If you actively support a party of traitors and domestic terrorists, you're super malicious. All nuance has been strangled and trampled down to mush about 9 years ago.

[–] blackwateropeth@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t want to live in a world where we find others with opposing views as hopeless. Anger and hate only lead to darker places. We need to hold people accountable but we should never let blind rage control our decision making.

I agree with you. But how many times does a friend need to bicycle kick you in the balls before you stop calling them, and possibly call the police?

[–] snazzlles@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

You're kicking off over an acquaintance?

[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

You shouldn't exclude people from your circles for different political views.

How are you going to reach them and get some sense back into their boggled minds if you distance yourself only?