this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
        
      
      270 points (86.1% liked)
      science
    22331 readers
  
      
      200 users here now
      A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
        founded 2 years ago
      
      MODERATORS
      
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    view the rest of the comments
Eh, if the simulation were allowed to develop organically from the beginning, then it makes sense to me. If it has the fidelity for the subatomic particles comprising your eye then it has the fidelity for macroscopic particles getting in your eye.
I see dust in my eye as a better argument against the existence of a benevolent creator deity, personally.
Sure, either of those arguments. Both of them are incorrect. Not a simulation, no god. We just are.