this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
95 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

75756 readers
2293 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 16 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (11 children)

What should that babble even mean?

In a data center, you have 4 main problems:

  1. Get an massive amount of computers there, and maintain them to keep working, including repairs and upgrades
  2. Get an massive amount of data there and the results back
  3. Get a constant and massive flow of electrical power there
  4. Get an equally massive amount of heat away from it.

Being in orbit helps with exactly none of that. For example, the heat: In orbit, there is no air or water which would work as a cooling medium, but just a vacuum which cools almost nothing. It is like a vacuum flask. Get your smart phone when running hot in such a vacuum flask and tell me how it worked....

So what is the purpose of all that bullshit??

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca -2 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

I'm talking out of my ass. So I'm not arguing with you but I'd think

  1. Fuck all to say to this. This would make 1 SO much more difficult.

  2. Seems feasible enough with satellites. Though the latency could be problematic I could see this being useful for certain applications.

  3. If it was in orbit you could build a nuclear reactor of some kind without worrying about the fallout from an explosion as much as you would on earth. Alternately, I'd imagine solar panels are more effective in space? You don't need to worry about clouds or night time as much . I'd imagine they're more effective in space but fucked if I know if that's accurate

  4. This would be the real advantage here wouldn't it? Isn't space really, really cold? I'd imagine you could vent the heat from the data center or just fully expose it to the vacuum to keep the heat down, couldn't you?

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Space isn't cold, it's nothing. It's a vacuum and vacuum is terrible at heat transfer by convection. It's why thermos bottles have a vacuum layer to prevent heat transfer. You can try to lose some heat by radiant cooling, but that's slow and if you're using solar for power then any radiators become heat sinks picking up more heat from the sun. Then there's conduction, and again, there's really nowhere to conduct any heat to, what with the large distance between objects and the vacuum and all. Thermal management in space is kind of a hard problem.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world -5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If it was impossible to remove heat from things in space we wouldn't have spacecraft or satellites. We wouldn't have a permanently manned research outpost in orbit. Hell, the Earth would probably be a big molten ball of lava. But we can effectively remove heat from an in-vacuum system that produces its own heat, all you need are radiators. If it's radiating too slowly, you get a bigger radiator.

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I didn't say it was impossible, I said it was hard. Bigger radiators absorb more heat when exposed to the sun. One of the problems becomes keeping the solar panels exposed to sunlight while keeping the radiators out of it. Putting them behind the solar panels might work, but they have to be smaller than the solar panels and any energy the solar panels don't convert to electricity will be re-radiated as heat and picked up by the radiators, requiring a larger size. You could put them on the 'back" side of the spacecraft, but that limits the size. As mentioned in another comment, you could position the spacecraft in geostationary orbit on the terminator, but then reaction mass requirements for station keeping and data signal latency go way up. It's a problem that has been worked around by people much smarter than me, but a lot of work went into figuring it out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)