this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
686 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

75756 readers
7114 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, that's something that absolutely has to change. I don't care if "career criminals get out of charges all the time". A false charge should not follow you for the rest of your life.

Then again, I also believe that if you serve your time in prison and are released, you should not have a publicly searchable record that can be used to deny you opportunities. So take my opinion as you will

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed, and prison should be for rehabilitation.

Perhaps prisoners could be released in one of two states: completed time or rehabilitated. The latter carries a much lower chance of recidivism. Maybe the first iffense could be hidden regardless, and expunged entirely after some period of time (10 years?), whereas on the second offense, both are searchable.

IDK, but I do believe in forgiveness.

[–] rami@ani.social 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think a lot about the Scandinavian prison where the guards forgot to lock the cells and the inmates used the night to do some baking.

Right! Which of you fuckers made ... mmm nom ... these .... nom nom ... really tasty fairy cakes?

[–] rami@ani.social 3 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I do agree on principle but somewhere in the back of my brain it's going "what about repeat violent offenders." But I feel like any solution I can come up with could be pretty easily used by the state as a force of marginalization anyway. So back at square one.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Even when it's repeat violent offenders - why would you want to prevent them from getting jobs? What do you think will happen if you release them from prison, once they finish serving their sentence, and they can't get jobs?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

That's good. These ideas of focusing on the potential career criminals are deeply ingrained in our culture, but when we challenge the potential outcomes we can resist giving the government and businesses more power to hurt innocent people

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

"what about repeat violent offenders."

This is conservative paranoia propaganda at work. People who are violent offenders become repeat violent offenders because of the system that we have in place not in spite of it. And the percentage of violent offenders in our prison system is severely out of proportion to those of the nonviolent variety who make up the bulk of our inmate population.