this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
163 points (98.8% liked)

News

32974 readers
5436 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

People keep talking about Trump threatening to use nukes, but I kinda suspect we should be more immediately worried about something like a bioweapon and a fully privatized vaccine that will be given to military first, and then sold for the highest bid to the public.

Wild guess who profits the most and also gets first dibs on the vaccine/first dibs on receiving a "nonvaccine preventative" since vaccine is a dirty word to the people who profit from this shit.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I thought China or Russia would do it but doesn't seem they think that would work long term. If the US did as a false flag it would be dangerously close to plagiarizing V for Vendetta.

[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Tomahawk missiles are Russia’s latest red line. Will Trump call Putin’s bluff?

Russia’s attempts to impose red lines on Ukraine’s Western allies are a key part of the intimidation tactics employed by Putin since the start of the war. During his address announcing the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Putin threatened the West with “such consequences that you have never faced in your history” if they dared to intervene. This rather obvious reference to nuclear war set the tone for the relentless nuclear blackmail that has followed. When it became apparent last year that Putin’s nuclear bluster was losing its potency, he ostentatiously revised Russia’s nuclear doctrine to lower the threshold for nuclear strikes and heighten the fear factor throughout the democratic world.

Russia’s nuclear threats have certainly not been subtle, but they have proved surprisingly effective against risk-averse Western leaders. From the eve of the invasion onward, every single debate over the delivery of new weapons to Ukraine has been dragged out and delayed by overblown fears of possible escalation and craven talk of the need to avoid provoking Putin.

The timidity of the West has only served to embolden the Kremlin dictator and prolong the war, enabling Russia to punch well above its geopolitical weight against far wealthier and better armed opponents. Indeed, while his armies have struggled to advance on the battlefields of Ukraine, Putin’s ability to intimidate the West has been arguably his single biggest success of the entire invasion.

This success is all the more remarkable given how many times Putin’s threats have been exposed as empty. Russia’s unilaterally declared red lines over the supply of everything from Javelin anti-tank weapons and Patriot air defense systems to F-16 fighter jets and Leopard tanks have all eventually been violated without consequence. Likewise, the Ukrainian army has repeatedly demonstrated its complete disregard for Putin’s red lines by liberating large swathes of the country from Russian occupation, chasing the Russian Black Sea Fleet out of Crimea, and invading Russia itself.

None of this has sparked World War III. On the contrary, Putin has responded to each fresh military setback by attempting to downplay the significance of his latest humiliation. Russian retreats have been rebranded in Orwellian fashion as “goodwill gestures,” while earlier protests over the planned delivery of new weapons systems have been replaced by expressions of defiant indifference.

I think if nukes are going to be the thing to take us out in the near future it will be due to these idiots testing nuclear weapons as part of the long tradition of dick measuring.

[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Make Looten Plunder a cartoon character again!

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is some wild fucking speculation. You got any basis for this claim or just vibes?

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I just think Trump, like Putin usually tends to use nuclear war threats to intimidate and distract, so I'm less inclined to think a real fear of nuclear threats would be reason for them to move on to a military base.

Emergent BioSolutions Releases New Survey Findings Revealing Heightened Concerns About Biological Threats and U.S. Preparedness

This was published 2 days ago by the company that stockpiles vaccines for the U.S. They've had all kinds of shady scandals in the past regarding government contracts and vaccinations. They manufacture narcan as well as vaccines for monkey pox, small pox, the only anthrax vaccine, and I think a few others. They used to be called BioPort, but they changed their name after the Anthrax vaccine that many soldiers were forced to get during the gulf war was linked to gulf war syndrome.

Trump also had some shady dealings with them just before the COVID pandemic to make a lot of money with government contracts and bio warfare https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/before-the-pandemic-top-contractor-received-billions-from-government-to-help-prepare-the-nation-for-biowarfare/2020/06/17/38d9ad3a-a41b-11ea-8681-7d471bf20207_story.html

Also seems odd that two days ago HHS fired their biosecurity adviser, Steven Hatfill especially given his history.

How The FBI Botched the 2001 Anthrax Scare Hatfill was falsely accused of being the bioterrorist who sent out anthrax in letters mailed in the U.S. following 9/11. His career was destroyed, and he eventually sued the FBI for harassment and rightfully won.

I could definitely be wrong about their exact reason for moving on to the base, but I just think something like this would be more likely than a nuclear threat. Whatever it is, it doesn't seem like anything we should not be worried about.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, so yeah. Wild speculation. Those are some interesting dots, but they don't make your unicorn even if you connect them all.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think I remember reading about something like this in Biohazard by Ken Alibek: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biohazard_(book)

Although it might just be easier to do using good old variola (Demon in the Freezer by Richard Preston).