this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
252 points (97.7% liked)

News

32975 readers
3148 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

This idea keeps coming up and while it sounds great it has the slight problem that states don't pay taxes, people do. Basically your suggestion is then that people living in blue states should stop paying their taxes. Now, the majority of those taxes are collected for them by the companies they work for. You can reduce (maybe eliminate I'm not actually sure if you can opt into 0% withholding) how much is collected by your employer by filing out a new W-4 form, if they let you. But even setting that aside there's the problem that none of that will matter in the slightest when the IRS comes for you with an arrest warrant for unpaid taxes. Or they might just start garnishing your wages, I'm honestly not 100% sure how that would play out. I just know that number 1 rule is you don't fuck with the IRS.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

To be fair, the IRS has had their budget cut and will be unlikely to come and arrest the people of one state let alone several. Heck if every blue voter stopped paying taxes then there's about 5/8ths of fuck all the IRS could do about it.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If they arrested you it would not be a big deal but what they do is keep on piling on fees and interest while garnishing any check you produce.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

That's a great point, giving amnesty for withholding tax could be a good way to secure votes, could lead to a slippery slope though ..

But given America is a capitalist hellhole, the voters real power should be in their capital, if a provider isn't giving you what you are paying for them you shouldn't have to pay them.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Those can’t be effectively collected when the government/court is shut down

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Its not a paid person that collects and even if the process is not automated enough its again the fees and interest.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

There likely wouldn't be enough IRS agents to audit that many people at once. There aren't enough to go after tax cheats when people abide by the system en masse, so if there were a concerted effort to stop paying, they would probably have trouble with enforcement.

Now, I'm 100% certain that the Trump admin would push the IRS to "make examples" of a few unlucky people, and I'm not expecting a large enough pool of people participating in the new viral meme "just don't pay your taxes, they can't arrest us all" for it to matter.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

I looked it up the last time this was discussed, the IRS can override and put back the withholding you requested taken off.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The states do pay taxes to the federal government. States are some of the largest employers, and they pay federal payroll taxes. Those could be withheld.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No court would uphold that.

Further, virtually all these state accounting and payroll systems are privatized. States don't pay federal payroll taxes. Officials simply administer contracts to private firms that handle payroll and deductions. And you're not going to like who the managers of these mega-accounting and payroll management companies supported in 2024.

What you're asking these officials to do is issue an obviously illegal order to a subordinate who will simply ignore them and report them to the IRS for prosecution.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

No court would uphold the federal government, and specifically the executive branch, withholding congressionally appropriated funds destined to states. And yet here we are.