this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
480 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
75756 readers
6803 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is a great change. I wonder how long before the hate brigade comes along to complain.
You've got a downvote, so it seems not long. ๐
Yup, sounds great to me. I could see a world in which it becomes a bad thing because they try to enforce it by pulling a Google and blocking users from installing extensions that aren't through their official add-on store, but as it is, it's hard to see any reasonable criticism.
They can't unlike google they don't have any leverage to enforce it. They only have a small market share.
insert rant about Mozilla CEO
It's not clear whether it's a useless disclosure or enforced by the API.
Some extensions have a verified/recommended by Mozilla seal of approval, so these extensions would be checked by a human to see that they comply.
Obviously they can't check every update of every extension in existence, but even just the above is an improvement and certainly not useless.
I don't think this could be enforced by the API without also seriously limiting what extensions can do, which people would go crazy about if they did.