this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
4820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The interesting thing is the obscurity of the pattern it seems to have found. Why should insecure computer programs be associated with Nazism? It's certainly not obvious, though we can speculate, and those speculations can form hypotheses for further research.

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Agreed, it was definitely a good read. Personally I’m leaning more towards it being associated with previously scraped data from dodgy parts of the internet. It’d be amusing if it is simply “poor logic = far right rhetoric” though.

That was my thought as well. Here's what I thought as I went through:

  1. Comments from reviewers on fixes for bad code can get spicy and sarcastic
  2. Wait, they removed that; so maybe it's comments in malicious code
  3. Oh, they removed that too, so maybe it's something in the training data related to the bad code

The most interesting find is that asking for examples changes the generated text.

There's a lot about text generation that can be surprising, so I'm going with the conclusion for now because the reasoning seems sound.