Today I Learned
What did you learn today? Share it with us!
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Partnered Communities
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
view the rest of the comments
And "inflation is good for the economy"
A small amount of predictable inflation is good for the economy. You get to pay your car loan back with dollars that are smaller than the ones the bank fronted in the first place, and the bank has money to load at all because it makes sense for everyone in town to deposit their extra dollars rather than just hiding them at home.
It'd be nice to have some revaluing of physical currency though, since the spending power of a single dollar today is about what a nickel was a century ago. I wouldnt mind if tiny metal discs with Jefferson's face said "one dollar".
I would maybe argue that, when it comes to debt, sure inflation might be good, but only if inflation is higher than the interest rate. This is because the amount owed (initial plus interest) is decreasing in value due to inflation. However, if one doesn't have debt (besides national debt, I suppose), then this argument is moot.
Devaluing a currency over time incentivizes it to be spent, which could be argued is a good thing, but there's a problem. Human necessities exist on a market, so the money has to be spent, anyway, on things like food and housing. Devaluing currency faster than one can save it (inflation is greater than the interest rate given by banks) only serves to make it harder to make large purchases. One can buy their necessities, but struggles to save for a house because money not spent on necessities loses value too fast to be saved for a down payment. Pair this with wage stagnation, and we see that the difference between net income and necessities can become negative: income is no longer enough for necessities, and saving is impossible.
devalueing currency doesnt incentivize money to be spent when you combine it with a shitload of speculation incentives (and various backroom deals, acting as socialism for the rich only) that turns your entire economy into a gambling den
You seem to be blurring the line between "good for me" with "good for the economy".
Why would a bank loan you money if you're not paying enough in interest to offset the cost of inflation? Historically in such systems banks charge loan fees instead, and with those fees loans tend to be net-higher since capital seeks other investments, such as commodity trading (which tends to drive up the price for necessities, too!)
Bank loans for large purchases are, btw, very good things. If you are going to be not-spending $2000 a month for 20 years to buy yourself a home, it's better for everyone if you can just live in said home while you do.
Please note that I'm NOT refuting your other points. Wage stagnation and income inequality are very bad things, and inflation does tend to exacerbate those things.
(We also haven't talked about deflation,
That claim is only controversial among people who don’t understand macroeconomics. Those are often the same people who think deflation is a good thing.
I mean, sure, it would be nice if housing prices were back at 2015 levels. Except the main way there is through another housing market or broader economic collapse.
it would not be ideal to think otherwise