this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
196 points (100.0% liked)

science

22293 readers
698 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
laverabe@lemmy.world
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip
196
AI sycophancy (excessively agreeing with user) is pervasive and harmful for people who seek advice from AIs (arxiv.org)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by zlatiah@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Relatively new arXiv preprint that got featured on Nature News, I slightly adjusted the title to be less technical. The discovery was done using aggregated online Q&A... one of the funnier sources being 2000 popular questions from r/AmITheAsshole that were rated YTA by the most upvoted response. Study seems robust, and they even did several-hundred participants trials with real humans.

A separate preprint measured sycophancy across various LLMs in a math competition-context (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.04721), where apparently GPT-5 was the least sycophantic (+29.0), and DeepSeek-V3.1 was the most (+70.2)

The Nature News report (which I find a bit too biased towards researchers): https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03390-0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

collapsed inline media

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 21 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of a tweet from a few years ago that said something along the lines of "Middle managers think AI is intelligent because it speaks just like they do instead of realizing it means that they aren't intelligent "

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

it really do be like that