this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
925 points (96.4% liked)

People Twitter

8443 readers
2305 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean you have signed a contract requiring you to be at work at 7.

The question is "Why should contracts specify the exact time?"

If you sign a contract with valid stipulations, of course you're required to abide by it, but the subject of the conversation is this specific stipulation.

The claim is that "requiring you to be at work at 7" is an outdated norm.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it is much easier to make that sort of contract than measure some objective "work done" metric. Unless you're hoping to be signing piecework/work by tender contracts all the time.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My employer mandates 40h of work per week and a core working time where all employees are supposed to be available. No fixed hours required. I don't see how fixing hours is easier than that.

And ultimately, that is my point: Why set fixed times, if the time itself doesn't actually matter?

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It can be that the employer just considers it easiest for them.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's hardly a good reason to continue doing it. I consider it easiest to just let me work whenever I want to and stop worrying about how much.

If there's no big consequence to starting a few minutes later, Employers shouldn't be so anal about it. It's a waste of everyone's time and will probably cost more time and productivity than those few minutes I wasn't gonna be super productive anyway.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean for the employer it's a fine reason. If they didn't get their way with that then they'd probably have to figure out a different system. But right now most workers have set hours

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But right now most workers have set hours

And the whole thread is about workers not wanting it.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 23 hours ago

It's sorta tough shit as long as you are under such contract. Then again, breaking it is one way to get out of it