this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
925 points (96.4% liked)

People Twitter

8443 readers
2305 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My argument is that flex should be the norm. If there is no explicit reason for rigid times, they shouldn't be rigid.

There is no norm. It depends on the country and their social structure aswell as their laws/agreed upon methods. You can always look for jobs/appointments etc that have flexible times. But good luck arguing with, e.g. a doctor about your appointment being flexible.

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the other poster covered that by specifically talking about appointments. Reread what they said, its pretty damn valid. My job for instance would have very little consequences if I'm ten minutes late. I've told my manager that I may be later dropping off kids and such, they are fine with that. The point is the culture doesn't change if we don't push it to change.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cool. Then you have that flex agreement with someone. If that works, it works.

In a social context, aka not work, the agreement with me would say that the time is the time. If you don't value my time the same as yours, then we will eventually stop spending time together.

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Cool. So if I push that and that becomes the social norm at the workplace, then you should also be cool with that because that's the direction. So if we as a society starting pushing for those things, everyone is hunk dory with that being a normal thing and this whole conversation is fucking moot which what the original replied was saying. but by all means let's shift this all to a discussion on social context all of a sudden.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nope. I'm not ok with it in a social context.

You are talking about changing about a social structure, then get confused that i talk about the social factor? Get your thoughts in order.