politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Only problem is that cost of living problems are world wide and not just NYC.
He's running for NYC, not mayor of earth. Someones gotta start it.
Yeah hopefully it'll be him but I have my doubts looking at his list of promises.
I don't see him implementing all of his policies, but then I'm not afraid of he actually does implement some of them.
Its the problem Democrats (and other left leaning parties) fundamentally have.
Right wing supporters more or less want nothing to change outside of the right people to suffer just a little bit more. So if their candidate hurts the wrong people? Whatever, they looked black enough, it's still good.
Left wing? We actually want something. But what we want varies drastically. You want a focus on healthcare. I want UBI. Fred there... doesn't give a shit about trans people but DOES want lower taxes. And so forth.
And that is the problem. If people vote for a candidate because they want X and don't get X? It is a rapid trip to "my vote doesn't matter" and "douche and a turd sandwich". We saw a lot of that happen with Biden and Obama where people outright ignore the good they did in favor of the good they didn't do.
So its a balancing act. Promise big so you can get votes but not so big that those voters get disillusioned. This very much seems like the latter to me but I also know that NYC is REAL weird economically so it might actually be feasible since the folk buying those minimum wage fueled services tend to have "real" jobs.
Yeah. I also feel like there is a push by some conservatives to leftists to have this view. Don't participate in elections, just protest in a specific way that we can film to distort your arguments to our audience.
Yeah. It is why I very much side eye the people who feel the need to talk about how the most pointless and milquetoast of things are "better than nothing".
The reality is that people only care so much for any given set of indignities. And most people are perfectly happy to equate "I marched with Dr King" and "I only watched a little bit of Twitch during the boycott"
It's still a start, and it has to start somewhere. It absolutely will not be passed at the national level before it's passed anywhere else.
"This attempt to help some people doesn't solve everyone's problems everywhere all at once, therefore it's not good enough!"
This is an excellent example of twisting someone's comment around enough to get angry at it instead of trying to understand it.
Literally: "the problem [with the proposed action] is that it only applies to a specific area and not the whole world"
I didn't twist anything. Your comment doesn't contain any more nuance than that.
It’s like trying to solve inflation by solving it in NYC.