this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
364 points (99.7% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3450 readers
438 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes/pics of text
Post news related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It depends on how you look at it, but since Republicans have control of every branch of the government, the fact they can't break the shutdown looks really bad.
Republicans just need to sway something like 5 democrats across all three branches of the government and can't. You could argue it's the democrats being intransigent, but it's not like democratic constituents aren't hurting.
What all this really means is that even though Republicans control everything, they are hated so fiercely that democrats can hold their position without losing support. It seems the opposite isn't true and republican constituents are getting angry. That seems as close to winning/losing you can get.
also the the democrats demands are reasonable, bordering on limp wristed. the republicans labeling them as radical leftist demands are patently absurd. even Marjory Taylor Green is advocating for what the democrats are demanding right now.
the populace blames the republicans because you can try to rig the game but you can't fake influence.
Democrats are holding up closure and Republicans haven't totally abandoned the filibuster mechanic. So they keep holding closure votes that need 60 Senators and failing to get a supermajority.
Angry enough to do what? They're living in red states and red counties, owned and operated by Republican loyalists. Their votes don't matter, because their elections are fully captured by a corrupt administration.
And all that "2A Remedies" crap just clears the way for Nick Fuentes to take over from Charlie Kirk.
I'm not saying it's going to matter (it may or may not). All I was calling out is why you might consider the Republicans losing this particular battle.
When you're hold most of the cards and still can't accomplish what you want, that seems like a loss.
Given that national security services continue to receive funding while the civilian administrative state is on indefinite furlough, I've got to ask why you think Republicans object to this arrangement?
Who says Republicans aren't getting what they want? We've got no budget but we can still bomb random boats in the Caribbean and drag people around by their hair in Pasadena. Milei got $40B in USAID money gift wrapped to him on the eve of his party's midterms. Trump's jet-setting to East Asia to be wined and dined by our most loyal satraps, while the White House undergoes a corporately financed face lift.
What isn't this administration accomplishing, exactly? Oh no! We've got no money for SNAP, a thing conservatives have always deeply cared about!
*cloture