politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
First of all, how is a site named "techdirt" always hitting the nail on the head with political commentary?
The problem is that our government was designed to put ambitious people in competing roles. Certain powers are controlled by Congress, others by the President, and still others by the Judiciary. Each branch has checks against the power of the other, and two of the branches ultimately have to answer to the people in elections. They assumed that each branch would seek to make sure that the other branches stayed in line, to preserve their own power.
But what happens when one movement co-opts all three branches, and now the branches refuse to rein each other in? Our Constitution has no answer for this. If any other President has pulled what Trump pulled today with his generals, he would have gotten impeached on the spot. Trump gets away with it, because the Congress and the Courts let him.
Because at nearly 30 years old it's literally one of the oldest news sites on the Internet...
And they expanded from just tech news decades ago?
Like, their CEO (who wrote this article) is the one that coined the term "Streisand Effect"...
They're kind of a big deal outside of just tech and have been for a long time.
Not OP but… Huh, TIL. Would not have expected that.
Techdirt had a back in March titled Why Techdirt Is Now A Democracy Blog (Whether We Like It Or Not) to explain their current direction.
Haha, I just posted a reply with a link to the same article; I should have checked downthread first to see if anyone else had posted it. This piece is one of my favourite things I've read this year. I remember finding it so refreshing when it came out. Previously, I had read bits and bobs of good journalism from techdirt, but this sealed my respect for techdirt (and Mike Masnick).
Y
I never understood how Hitler got such power until Trump came along. Then I realized it wasn't Hitler giving orders, it was that the people in the system wanted it. They wanted to give him their power.
Thankfully, the United States is nowhere as unified as Germany was leading up to World War 2.
Don't get it wrong. The "unity" in Germany was the result of "first they came for...". Hitler didn't win any fair election. Only after jailing all the opposing parties he won.
- George Washington
Luigi learns the shadow-clone jutsu.
One of my favourite things I've read this year was Mike Masnick's "Why Techdirt Is Now A Democracy Blog (Whether We Like It Or Not)" . Even before things went to shit in the US, so much of tech journalism was trash because it refused to acknowledge that it doesn't make sense to talk about technology as if it somehow separate from society. The article I linked shows that Techdirt (or at the very least, Masnick) understands this.
You're right though, that it is gross how ostensibly politics journalism so often fails to make any meaningful political commentary. I appreciate techdirt, but I wish that we had more places doing political commentary like this.
I think it does.
No, the Constitution doesn't, but this does
It has several:
All of them require We the People to be actively engaged in the process.