this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
1144 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

76917 readers
3163 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Google’s developer verification will only run on mainstream Android with play services. It’s not supposed won’t be running in standard AOSP so the easiest solution would be to switch to a custom ROM like GrapheneOS.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 month ago

They are also working to similarly kill custom ROMs. Just recently the GrapheneOS team mentioned that Google is no longer making their hardware drivers Open Source, and so compatibility with new phones means reverse engineering their own drivers - which is a big reason that custom ROMs support such narrow hardware options already and very often come with limitations and/or features that just don't work. At best, they figure out how to make it work, but it takes time and updates can lag significantly behind.

We have a lot of options on the software side for avoiding google (or android), but very limited options on hardware. We need open source mobile hardware support ASAP.

[–] cosmo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While true, the pool of unlockable devices are dwindling fast.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

even the OP is softlocking thier newer phones(arbitrary online application to unlock it) in the near future, i expect a full lock sooner or later

[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True…. I heard GrapheneOS is having trouble porting to the Pixel 10

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, aren’t some critical apps like banking apps starting to ban unlocked / non-stock systems? Heard someone complaining about this a while ago.

[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, banking apps, streaming apps, even some shopping apps. This has been a problem for a long time. Sometimes its for “security” reasons and sometimes its simply because the app uses Play Service APIs. Another issue on de-googled systems is push notifications, though that is often fixed through alternates like Unified Push

[–] coolkie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

But remember, unlocking bootloader is harder and harder for many devices. And Google's Play Integrity and API changes makes removing trace of unlocked bootloader harder. Many apps not just banking, ChatGPT, games, some of social media is completely unusable in that scenario.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't have that choice in Denmark due to NemID.

[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like other people have suggested, maybe get a second phone (one of those really cheap ones with play Services) and use that for that stuff, and keep your main personal phone google-free.

[–] ninjascum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This is the way for me too

[–] bay400@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At this point the solution seems to just be having a second phone for that kinda shit

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't like that my neighbours are noisy, guess i should get a second house for when they're shouting

[–] bay400@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ah yes because phones are $400,000-$1,000,000+

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm comparing the impracticality, not the monetary impact

[–] bay400@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ah yes because those things are completely unrelated

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  • Carrying two massive slabs because a few apps won't run on one of them

  • Having a second home because some nights you can't sleep in one due to noisy neighbours

Where the more simple solution would be:

  • Have a phone that can run all of the apps you need so you don't need to buy and carry around a second phone
  • deal with your neighbours and sort stuff out rather than buy and travel to and from a second home.
[–] bay400@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

two massive slabs

bro what year are you living in? 1987?

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

No, I'm 2025 where a "small" phone is now 6x3"

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can just install Android. Only certified vendors will have the blocking activated.

[–] nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Well, fuck. Most of people use F-Droid on "certified vendors" device.