World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
There's more to this than JUST that. Not that you're wrong of course.
China subsidizes heavily because they want to be the only relevant player in the global EV market. These cars would cost closer to their non-Chinese counterparts if China wasn't doing this.
In global economics, this is considered unfair, and is usually retaliated against via tariffs.
The west: throws billions of tax payers money for decades at auto industry
stimulating the economy
China: tries to do the same
unfair capitalism!!!!!!
If it makes Yankees feel better, they should just mentally add a "TM" mark next to "China" when talks about subsidies arise.
BTW the Dacia spring is priced similarly to the Chinese models. Maybe it's not simply China bad, maybe it's the western manufacturers who lost their dominion.
Dacia is a western manufacturer lol, Renault is French.
Who threw billions in tax money at Mercedes? Audi? BMW?
Why wouldn't we let them in too drain the Chinese economy then. We would "win" in the short term by getting vehicles with fewer emissions while siphoning money out of the Chinese economy. Later when they could no longer afford to offer the vehicles at such a low price another company would step in with a superior product. At least that's what I've been taught about how capitalism works. Was that all a lie?
The Chinese government can afford to pay their manufacturers 10-20k euros per car indefinitely, there's no real limit to how much money they have. They'll continue until every western manufacturer is bankrupt.
I know you probably realize this, but no. It's not how capitalism works in the real world. In the real world, when you have products that cost billions to develop before production, it's nearly impossible for a new company to be competitive against a monopoly. And if the Chinese give away semi-free cars to everyone for a decade, everyone else goes bankrupt and they have a monopoly. OR other countries start sacrificing other budget items so they could subsidize their domestic car manufacturing and we just have... even more cars on the roads and less public transit, less walkable cities. Yay!
It's a complex subject, right? From a consumer's perspective, you could have a cheaper car, but your government won't let you (by putting tariffs on them, or just straightout banning them) because China is not playing fair. As a consumer you are paying a price because of your ideology. I don't know if everyone will want to do that.
And on the other hand, from the Chinese government's perspective, they aren't going to care if you think they are fair, as long as things are working out for them. If subsidizing means better product and/or markat dominance, why won't they keep doing that? There are markets that are more ideologically aligned with them willing to take their products.
So what? Their economic model is able to churn out better product at lower prices, and the useful idiots in the West (you) cheer because you get worse deals.
I don't care what "global economics" says. Have you seen the global economy? Do you think you're a player, or just another pawn (useful idiot)?
Now, run along and go be average somewhere else. I'm genuinely tired of arguing with you people.
Subsidies designed to bankrupt the competition isn't a better economic model
You'd have a point if the West could churn out competitive EVs.
Gonna block you now. I'm sick of stupid people and it's a shame how many morons agree with you.
More reasons for me not to take the crowd seriously!
Sure buddy, the highest quality stuff is from TEMU.
If it looks like a car, it's a car, right?
The west churns out BETTER EVs in many metrics. They just cost more because they're not subsidized.
If we allow the Chinese to bankrupt every other manufacturer using subsidies, guess what, they'll hike the prices 2-3x at least.
This is because at least here in the EU, governments want more people to use transit and fewer new cars to be sold, so they won't subsidize domestic car production. We even got a brand new car registration tax here as well as an annual road tax here in Estonia, do you consider that a bad thing too? Since it negatively impacts people's ability to buy more new cars...
Maybe understand the very basics of trade wars first lol
They're that cheap because the chinese government pays for them to be that cheap. It also helps that they exploit their workforce as much as possible, but they still wouldn't be as cheap as they are without the subsidies.
Oh my fucking god, it never ends with you morons.
So what if the chinese government pays for them to be cheap? Government intervention is literally part of their econony.
You, in typical dipshit fashion, don't recognize how you've been convinced to hate them simply because they can compete with your rulers.
Instead of recognizing how you're being played for a fool, you double and triple-down with all the other useful idiots.
I'm glad I can see it for what it is, because most of you are genuinely to stupid enough to do so yourselves.
Ignored.
There was no value judgement in mine (or the other guys) comment, that's entirely your victim complex. Of course I would rather china not try to destroy our local markets but that is very very low on the list of things to hate the ccp for and I can't say it's fundamentally morally wrong in the world we live in either.
It's just a fact that it's subsidized and your propaganda that it's cheap because china is just better at manufacturing is a flat out lie.
LOL. I thought you blocked us?
Good luck with your Chinese EV when you need parts and the company no longer exists. Three years from now.
This is called drop shipping, and we get cheap junk that breaks from China every day.
Their economic model is lose money on every car because the government is backing them.
They now owe 2.25X in debt more than the company is worth.