this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
82 points (97.7% liked)

Linux

9427 readers
357 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] LeFantome@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

think it's fair to say performance rust is hard to write

This situation proved exactly the opposite.

They wrote a utility to pass functional tests. It did. Then people said it was too slow. So, in just a few days or hours, they dramatically sped it up while still passing the tests.

Seems like it was pretty easy to write fast Rust code in this case.

[โ€“] chocrates@piefed.world 0 points 1 day ago

Fair point. I am mostly going on what I have seen others do on streams when comparing rust and go. Go seemed faster to get good performance and rust sometimes had to write a ton of code to get the same performance.

I don't know if you can selectively not use Go's garbage collector, but that seems to be the only reason Go might be theoretically slower than rust.