this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
443 points (88.1% liked)

Technology

75186 readers
2347 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive.is link to article from allabout.ai at https://www.allaboutai.com/resources/ai-statistics/ai-environment/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yes, but there's zero fucking actual benefit.

Seeing memes posted here that use AI while sitting on it is the most confusing thing to me.

Just... don't use it, people. The hole burning in AI bros' pockets will close up if you just stop making it profitable. Even the free ones are making money with ads. Don't use it, even for a joke.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Frankly focusing on the carbon output of AI models is a red herring. It's not a significant part of the problem and just makes people complacent in the form of feeling like we've achieved something if it succeeds. It's not worse than stuff like video games

Focus on the actual negative effects of AI, but carbon intensity isn't a major one

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago

I'm much more concerned about AI datacenters' use of evaporative cooling draining freshwater reserves than the carbon footprint atm

[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

we do a lot of things for no benefit. video games, golf, horse racing, grilling... all those have far larger carbon footprints. as someone else said, focus on the actual negatives of generative ai, like the proven cognitive decline and loneliness.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 6 hours ago

"AI" and related tech does a lot of useful translation work. It translates speech to text, one language to another, maybe skilled people can do these jobs more elegantly and correctly, but certainly not more cheaply.