168
JD Vance says it's a “statistical fact” that the left commits more political violence.
(newrepublic.com)
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
168 points (95.7% liked)
politics
25634 readers
2957 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can't think of any recent cases besides the guy that shot Steve Scalise. Do they have a list of cases they're going off, because 67% seems low.
They do, but they're almost all "eco-terrorism" related, which includes property damage as "violent". So basically, every time an environmentalist sabotages logging or mining equipment, it goes on the same list as folks that murder politicians, commit mass shootings, or blow up government buildings.
I mean, knowing that, I'm a little disappointed that eco terrorism only accounts for less than 33% of all "violent" crime.
Do or do not young padewan, inside you the force is
That’s an interesting point you raise. Could you point me to where I could read a bit more about how those stats are collected? Happy to Google but you seem in the know so figured I’d ask for directions.
You know what's a little concerning? Someone asked me to provide links to the research just a few months ago, and I had no problem googling several searchable databases that listed individual events along with the charges against the perpetrators. They were all right at the top of the list. I just tried to find them again, and they're not coming up in my search, at all. Now I wish I'd saved the links somewhere.
I'm not much into conspiracy theories, but this seems a bit fishy to me. I'll keep looking, and get back to you.
Probably counting protests as violence...
Lol, I don't think they're counting anything
Well, the ADL reached a conclusion of 75%. Obviously, it somewhat depends on methodology and chosen metrics.
The ADL has no credibility though. They count saying 'free Palestine' as an anti-Semitic attack, even when a Jew says it.
You'll perhaps recall that the ADL wasn't the source I originally used.
They were literally responding to you saying, "Well, the ADL reached a conclusion of 75%." so they can be forgiven for idk... mentioning the ADL.
@xxce2AAb@feddit.dk Knows their numbers
https://www.csis.org/analysis/war-comes-home-evolution-domestic-terrorism-united-states