this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
1443 points (98.1% liked)
People Twitter
8162 readers
2337 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You say "likely" a lot for someone arguing against me for not holding a hard opinion.
I've probably read more on this than you have, and posted what I felt about the available evidence, item by item, in another comment Here.
OK, I misread your comment. You said "don't totally believe" and I took that as "totally don't believe." It sounded like you were completely dismissing the possibility instead of expressing a lack of certainty.
But yeah, I'm on the same page here of not willing to say for certainty anything about this. I think the evidence is stronger for a far right motivation than a far left motivation. I also admit I have a less scientific reason for wanting that to be true: I want Trump to eat his words.
Hey fair enough. It's hard to tell if someone's misreading or lacks nuance. Glad to hear we're on the same-ish page.
I'm rooting for "disenfranchised guy who was sick of everything," because nothing will piss off both parties more than someone they can't fit in a box.