this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
833 points (99.2% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7741 readers
499 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
833
Farmer says 'we're in a very dire situation' ahead of harvest—with zero soybean orders from China, historically the largest buyer | Fortune (fortune.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
201 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35684522

Despite his support for Trump, Ragland has become increasingly vocal about the need for immediate trade resolution. “We desperately need to get something rectified quickly with China, our biggest export customer,” he told CNN. “We wanna encourage the administration to get a proactive trade deal done.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tyler@programming.dev 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sketchy ass site.

[–] miked@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There is a Snopes page about it.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I saw that they claimed that. Real news sources provide their sources, they don’t just say somebody else said stuff (which is what the entire article is doing).

[–] miked@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] tyler@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m not asking for the source. I understand how to search myself. I’m stating that, no matter how accurate this article might be if you go and look up the info yourself, you shouldn’t trust websites that say things like “it’s reported” and then don’t provide links or sources. I can say all I want that “Snopes says ‘trump eats babies’ is a fact”. If I don’t link that source, as a news website you should not trust me. There’s no reason to exclude it, except to normalize not providing your sources and then later on you can slip in whatever bullshit you want because now nobody has a source to check when you state things.

[–] miked@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Snopes provides multiple sources.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are completely ignoring my point. The sketchy site that doesn’t provide sources is timesnownews.

[–] miked@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Ohhh. I didn't trust that sketchy site either.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

that page must really be sketchy!

[–] miked@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

I knew I should have edited my post!