this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
501 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74966 readers
2727 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau and reported on by Apolloseems to show that large companies may be tapping the brakes on AI. Large companies (defined as having more than 250 employees) have reduced their AI usage, according to the data (click to expand the Tweet below). The slowdown started in June, when it was at roughly 13.5%, slipping to about 12% at the end of August. Most other lines, representing companies with fewer employees, are also at a decline, with some still increasing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Personal Anecdote

Last week I used the AI coding assistant within JetBrains DataGrip to build a fairly complex PostgreSQL function.

It put together a very well organized, easily readable function, complete with explanatory comments, that failed to execute because it was absolutely littered with errors.

I don't think it saved me any time but it did help remove my brain block by reorganizing my logic and forcing me to think through it from a different perspective. Then again, I could have accomplished the same thing by knocking off work for the day and going to the driving range.

[–] August27th@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago

Then again, I could have accomplished the same thing by knocking off work for the day and going to the driving range.

Hey, look at the bright side, as long as you were chained to your desk instead, that's all that matters.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At one point I tried to use a local model to generate something for me. It was full of errors, but after some searching online to look for a library or existing examples I found a github repo that was almost an exact copy of what it generated. The comments were the same, and the code was mostly the same, except this version wasn't fucked up.

It turns out text prediction isn't that great at understanding the logic of code. It's only good at copying existing code, but it doesn't understand why it works, so the predictive model fucks things up when it takes the less likely result. Maybe if you turn the temperature to only give the highest prediction it wouldn't be horrible, but you might as well just search online and copy the code that it's going to generate anyway.

[–] 7toed@midwest.social 2 points 10 hours ago

But.. how else do we sell our tool as a super intelligent sentient do-it-all?

[–] UncleMagpie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The bigger problem is that your skills are weakened a bit every time you use an assistant to write code.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The bigger problem is that your skills are weakened a bit every time you use an assistant to write code

Not when you factor in that you are now doing code review for it and fixing all its mistakes..

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It depends how you're using it. I use it for boilerplate code, for stubbing out classes and functions where I can tell it clearly what I want, for finding inconsistencies I might have missed, to advise me on possible tools and approaches for small things, and as a supplement to the documentation when I can't find what I'm looking for. I don't use it for architecting new things, writing complex and specialized code, or as a replacement for documentation. I feel like I have it fairly well contained to what it does well, so I don't waste my time on what it does badly, and it isn't really eating away at my coding brain because I still do the tricky bits myself.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly how it's meant to be used. People who think it's to be used for more than what you've described are not serious people.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

There is no "meant to be used". LLM were not created to solve a specific problem.