this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
626 points (98.8% liked)

News

32025 readers
3272 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/KNzH9

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 78 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I had 14 grand in a 401k. I had to spend it to survive for a year while I looked for a job. All of it.

Now I know 14k aint shit. But that is where we are.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 3 days ago (3 children)

14k would have been $132k in 45 years when you would have otherwise retired.

The power is in the interest. Even if you max out your 401k in the future it cannot make up for missing interest earnings on early deposits. Having to use it it now means nobody in this entire generation will ever retire, ever.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just to put it into perspective, if the inflation rate for the past 45 years predicts the next 45 years. $14K today = $55K in 45 years. A $75K household income today would be $294K in 45 years.

So $14K in a 401K saved for 45 years is a pittance and should never be considered a retirement "program". It's all bullshit to decrease and eliminate the cost of actual pension programs.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You don't just put $14k into a 401k, you keep contributing to it. Getting more and more money to compound upon itself.

If you put $4k into it every year (remember, this is pre-tax money and often has an employer match), and it grows 8% per year on average (S&P 500 actually does more like 10%, but we will be more conservative and say 8%), we will also be conservative and assume you won't increase contributions, even as you earn more later in life, then you have $1,546,022 after 45 years of working.

Yes, this is something you can retire on.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Gotta include inflation in there.

$1,546,022 in 45 years with the same inflation we've had for the past 45 years would only be worth $529,400 in todays money.

If you only plan on living for 10 years or less after retiring, then, Maybe.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You only get the 401k when you retire in US? This is not in addition to normal Social Security?

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most of us that are younger than the Boomers or maybe Gen X don't want to count on Social Security because we've been hearing our whole lives that Social Security is on the chopping block because the government is in so much debt. And at this point we kinda just expect that ladder to be pulled up behind the Boomers before we get anything, because that's already happened in so many other areas like home ownership.

I also think people need to remember that Social Security is their own money that they paid in over their lives, and they are owed it back.

And also that even though the US government has a large amount of debt, we've also spent the last 50 years giving tax cuts to the rich, we'd probably be just fine if we went back to a 90% marginal tax rate on the top earners like we had in the "good old days" of the 1950s.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most of us that are younger than the Boomers or maybe Gen X don’t want to count on Social Security because we’ve been hearing our whole lives that Social Security is on the chopping block because the government is in so much debt.

Thinking about it, the chance that Social Security money will be stolen and transferred to the 1% is quite high. Not because of the debt but simply to make the rich even richer. They will probably just say that the current system is not sustainable and move all the money into pension funds controlled by private banks which will then gamble with it pocketing the profits and socializing the loses. But 401k is the same so putting money there is not really a solution. The solution is to run away but obviously not everyone is able to.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The money has already been yanked from SS and other programs. It's included as part of the National Debt figure. They have taken the excess funds for decades and spent it. Having private banks hold and invest these funds instead is highly unlikely.

The government also relies on investment funds to buy treasury bills. Most 401K's at are set up to give the owner very little control over how they invest their money. All of the offered selections usually include treasury bills. So the government is borrowing money from 401K's and promising to pay it back as well.

That's all fine unless something happens to erode the trust and willingness of people around the world to lend money to the U.S. government.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 3 days ago

That’s all fine unless something happens to erode the trust and willingness of people around the world to lend money to the U.S. government.

Like electing a crazy person for president?

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Correct, you get both your own savings and Social Security during retirement. The person replying is being a doomer, rather than preparing for his future.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

401k will accrue interest (and will rise with the market). It's not just going to be JUST a straight inflation calculation.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And $132K in 45 years will buy you 1 Happy Meal. ;)

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 4 points 3 days ago

Without the toy, because we can't incentivize kids to ask for fast-food meals.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

I had $20K a 401K and $15K in school loans when I swapped jobs in my late 20's. Guess what I did with it.

3 years later I was able to purchase my first house because I saved up money instead of paying the student loans.

Right now I should be maximizing my retirement savings according to all the advisors. Instead I am using the money to pay for my kids college so they can start off in life above zero instead of -$50k like my wife and I did.

I figured out a long time ago that there is no way in hell I can retire and remain in the U.S. The system is rigged against me. So my goal for the next 10 years is to learn Spanish.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

14k is worth 14k, and you can live a very spartan year on it apparently.

[–] acxyzzy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Probably worth a lot less after early withdrawal penalties and taxes.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Yep. Was 18k originally.

[–] ScotinDub@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Luxury, I had 9.5k and had to spend it to survive for 2 years while I looked for a job.