this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
1227 points (96.9% liked)

interestingasfuck

8089 readers
2 users here now

interestingasfuck

founded 2 years ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 74 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

IMO, better to get consumer protection laws in place early and refine them over time, than not at all.

The longer these things wait, the more time corpos have to get their influence in and either stop the efforts or water them down to be entirely ineffective.

Edit: Don't forget to read about it. https://www.globallawtoday.com/law/legal-news/2025/06/denmarks-groundbreaking-move-copyright-for-faces-and-voices/

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But rushed and incomplete bills can come with bad implementations that make them useless

-this post is known to the state of California to cause cancer

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I can imagine situations where this is a bad idea, such as making almost all journalism illegal because you don't have to legal right to cover news about an individual.

Hopefully they plan for that.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are long established exceptions for use of copyrighted materials, and journalism is one of them.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Good for Denmark.

IMO, better to get laws in place early and refine them over time, than not at all.

So... Move fast and break things?