this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
287 points (98.3% liked)

pics

25311 readers
310 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not displeased enough to not be there.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (7 children)

So you expect them to trash their career? This isn't a job where you can easily take it or leave it. Imagine being under 40 and throwing away your retirement, starting all over.

They swore to uphold the Constitution, and so far their orders have not broken that vow.

[–] monsieur_hackerman@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago

Imagine being under 40 and thinking you'll be allowed to retire....

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's how authoritarianism wins every time. Do you expect people to resist? Careers, retirements, bonuses, if not them it will be someone else, this is not illegal just immoral, oh now it's illegal but not that illegal, oh now it's illegal but my boss would yell at me if I don't do it, oh now I'm too deep, fast forward two years and you're torturing last members of opposition in your newly built concentration camp and wondering not how it went so deep so fast, but when is the lunch and will you be able to torture enough people to get a good evaluation this month.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I get all that. I agree. All I'm saying is that these troops have not broken any laws, have not violated the Constitution. Trump can only deploy them in DC for 30-days, we'll see how that plays when time's up.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think I can answer that already

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

While you're right, it is also the national guard so it's a supplemental/part-time job and not the primary job for a lot of them.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My best friend from high school did a few years in the Army, the rest was with the Guard. Not sure how it all works, then or now, but that got him to 20-years and retirement benefits.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You have to do 20 years active for the full retirement. 20 years guard means you get retirement when you turn 55 or whatever. Unless you get medically retired and such.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I wondered about that. But he got some sort of deal at 39, which would be 20 years combined Army and Guard. He joined in 1989. Things different then?

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So you expect them to trash their career?

Yes.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You typing this from prison? It's easy to sit in your house and say shit like that. Nothing is stopping you.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

no, I guess it's too much to ask of the National Guard to guard the nation

land of the free, home of the brave lol...

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yet. Let's see what they do when their orders do violate the constitution.

A buck says 99.9% of them will still be okay with it.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Their orders have absolutely broken that vow.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You mean not displeased enough to get kicked out of the service and irreparably destroy their futures.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep. I used to work in D.C. and literally put my money where my mouth is on this one, so yep, that's exactly what I mean.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What does working in D.C. have to do with lawful military orders?