this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16376 readers
326 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm a career physicist, and I honestly have no idea what a state of matter is anymore.

An abstraction used for grouping kinds of things together for the purposes of making thinking about them a lot faster.

[–] la508@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can I offer you a nice smectic B3 liquid crystal in this trying time?

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Simple, "solid state" means "no moving parts", like a vacuum tube, for example.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Well I know the liquid phase is what happened after I ate at that filthy pizza place. Yikes.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Could there be a spherical object inside that tube? Just for familiarities sake

[–] TomasEkeli@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

Only if it's a cow

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Are gas atoms spherical?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Interacting fields of non-causality?

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would wager you have more of an idea of what a state of matter is than biologists do of what a species is. Humans like to put things into nest boxes but nature is under no deal obligation to cooperate.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'd actually argue the opposite. With states of matter, we're attempting to delineate how reality groups together sets of related properties that vary between conditions in similar ways for different substances.
Looking for the edges that nature drew.

With species though, we drew the lines. We drew them with a mind towards ensuring it's objectively measurable but it's still not a natural delineation. Taxonomists (biologists are actually a different field) mostly run into uncertainty with debating which categorization property takes precedence, and what observations of species have actually been made.
So while they debate which system to use, the particulars of the systems are pretty concrete.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago

States of matter and species are both cases where we drew the lines based on what we thought was obvious. Then we ran into cases that were not so obvious anymore and challenged how we define these lines.