this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
217 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73972 readers
3698 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redsunrise@programming.dev 101 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously it's higher. If it was any lower, they would've made a huge announcement out of it to prove they're better than the competition.

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 2 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago) (1 children)

I’m thinking otherwise. I think GPT5 is a much smaller model with some fallback to previous models when needed.

Since it’s running on the exact same hardware with a mostly similar algorithm, using less energy would directly mean it’s a “less intense” model, which translates into an inferior quality in American Investor Language (AIL) - which doesn’t give a flying fuck about energy efficiency since a while.

[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

They probably wouldn't really care how efficient it is, but they certainly would care that the costs are lower.