this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
413 points (93.5% liked)
People Twitter
7917 readers
528 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oh man...22 comments in 3 hours. Positively booming...
I am fairly confident, that there is more content on lemmy right now, than a person can sift through.
If there is more than about a dozen comments under a post, i rarely read all of them.
Not in the [not exactly small] niches I'm interested in. Front pages are stale for DAYS
Nah, just the "active" algorithm is shit in Lemmy. Try other sorts. I promise the feed will change. Not as much as I'd like, but it does change.
...I do. But the majority of the communities I subscribe to (and I have found multiple iterations across different instances) are not very active. Their reddit counterparts are.
You can stop trying to reject my experiences with your nonsense to make yourself look right. You're not.
I'm not rejecting your experience but pointing out the fact that other sorts are far more active.
It's not my or Lemmy's shortcoming that there aren't as many ~~bots~~ users posting on a platform that is MUCH newer and specifically in competition with the long-standing one, and your shitty attitude is going to produce the opposite result that you want.
Yeah I'm sure me pointing out that there being more content than a person can sift through doesn't matter if it's not the right kind of content, will keep all the people who aren't in Lemmy from joining Lemmy...
And apparently me stating that basic fact is enough to get labeled as a shitty attitude, as well as blamed for the actual shortcoming of having fewer people. Which is definitely not the type of aggressive behavior that is more likely to keep people away than an acknowledgement of current low population.
Good job.
Keep digging that hole, bud.