this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
48 points (91.4% liked)

Canada

10430 readers
650 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustToOdd@nerdculture.de 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

@Davriellelouna I suspect there were reasons for the denial. It seems those reasons might be an important part of the story.

[–] pubquiz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, no. While the right-wing industrial outrage complex might perseverate over some suspicious and hidden agenda, the truth is much simpler. Outside the bubble of red-right performative pearl clutching it is an Occam's Razor solution that is factually and blatantly clear: when your objective is to incite violence and intolerance, there is no Federal coddling or Constitutional protection. Even when you screw your toe into the ground and bat your fluttering eyelashes claiming innocence, you cannot pretend away the true meaning of this shill's tone-deaf rally. Hate-speech is dangerous to the public good as so is anyone who defends it.

[–] JustToOdd@nerdculture.de -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@pubquiz So, basically, you're saying there were reasons that the article didn't name. Thanks.

[–] pubquiz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Are you dense? Does every article written need full referencing for you to hold your smug comments? You are the reason a difference of opinion devolves into irrelevant diatribes on supposed tangents.

Fact: the "artist" is a right wing proponent Fact: the federal government does not support a point of view. Fact: the spewing of a political agenda is no sanctioned Fact: Even the Canadian champion of the right-wing nut-o-sphere, career political hack and recent loser, l'il pp, knows better than to spew his pus in federally funded venues.

Grow a brain. Or a brian, as the case may be.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Let me publicly apologize to you for the reaction your comment got.

This guy can eat a dick and I have no idea why we are giving him so much attention.

I fail to see what is wrong with your comment though. I read it several times. Perhaps others are misunderstanding what you said. Or I am I guess.