this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
275 points (97.6% liked)

politics

25187 readers
2777 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If "all of it" stems from one thing, it can't "all of it" stem from another thing. I'm not arguing for either, I'm just uppity about logic.

[–] grindemup@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Of course it can—why do you think something can't have multiple stems? No one said that it stems exclusively from one thing.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The "stem" is the thing itself, not the thing it stems from. A stem can't come from two places.

[–] grindemup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol what are you talking about? Many things can have a stem, such as a plant, which is not the same as the stem itself. According to all major dictionaries, stem can mean the main trunk of a plant, but it can also mean other certain plant part providing support. So your claim doesn't hold.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That... doesn't address my claim at all. A plant can have a million stems, if you wish. We're taking about a single stem, which comes from somewhere. If all of it comes from one place, it cannot also come from another.

[–] grindemup@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, we are taking about violence in a region, which can have many causes and origins. Violence in the region has stemmed from a combination of religion and foreign interference (and presumably many other things). If this isn't what your claim addresses, then your claim is irrelevant to this conversation.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Oh, buddy. You're in the wrong stem of this conversation. I said in my very first comment that I had no interest in being a part of the actual discussion and I was just complaining about the phrasing used. If you wanted to be part of the actual conversation, you should have picked literally any other comment to reply to.

What I'm saying is, you went to a court house and starting arguing your case to the hobo sleeping on the steps. Can't say that's on the hobo.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's kind of what the word "stem" means, both literally and figuratively.

[–] grindemup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Some definitions include the word "main"... and many definitions don't. So actually I don't see anything necessarily indicating that there can only be one stem.