Science

3877 readers

97 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyz

To the brain, Esperanto and Klingon appear the same as English or Mandarin. (news.mit.edu)

submitted 1 day ago by Bee@mander.xyz to c/science@mander.xyz

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that's their goal then it was a really dumb idea to pick these conlangs. It simply won't show any surprising data, since all of those languages implement recursion in one or another way.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

all of those languages implement recursion in one or another way

Yeah—Python and English are both recursive, so that doesn’t account for why the brain processes them differently. But they need to figure out what other feature does account for it—ideally by finding a pair of (probably artificial) languages that differ only in the exact feature which triggers the language network. Then they can figure out how that feature relates to recursion or any other mental abilities that might have co-evolved with language.