this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
403 points (98.6% liked)

World News

49173 readers
2139 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mexico’s president says ‘there will be no invasion … it’s absolutely off the table’ after news reports of order

Mexico’s president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has rejected the idea that the US might invade Mexico after news reports suggested Donald Trump had authorized the use of military force targeting drug cartels deemed terrorist organizations in Latin American countries.

“The United States is not going to come to Mexico with their military,” she said during a daily news conference on Friday. “We cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion. It’s off the table, absolutely off the table.”

The Mexican president said her government had been informed of the executive order but insisted that “it had nothing to do with the participation of any military or any institution on our territory. There is no risk that they will invade our territory.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can easily but should not.

It’s a stupid fucking idea.

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Okay, now compare it to the idea of Canada as the 51st state next? Which will Trump act on first, or is this just talk about annexation?

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's also a stupid idea. Don't know what you were trying to accomplish by bringing that up.

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Both are related in the deployment of military forces in other countries. So lets compare the stupidity of the idea, which is worse? Or both are equal in their stupidity? I guess since Canada has a smaller population concentrated only at the US border it would be less difficult than Mexico in a shooting war for the US. Since Trump is "commander in chief" of the armed force I guess he could order such invasions? Would the military follow the order because of the law and command hierarchy? asking for a friend