this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
654 points (84.0% liked)

Technology

73850 readers
3448 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

But yes. Exactly in the use of "Artificial Intelligence".

Artificial Intelligence is a wide field, consisting of a plethora of methods. LLMs like ChatGPT are part of this wide field, as per definition how researchers are describing the field.

The "intelligence" part is an issue though if taken literal, since we have no clear definition of what "intelligence" even is. Neither for human / natural intelligence, nor for artificial. But that's how the field was labled. We have created a category for a bunch of methods, models and algorithms and sticked "AI" onto it. Therefore I stand by what I have said before:

It is AI.

Due to the lack of a clear definition for "intelligence" I would coarsely outline AI as: mimicking natural thinking, problem solving and decision processes without necessarily being identical. (This makes it difficult to distinguish it from plain calculators though, so a better definition is required.) So if we have a model that is able to distinguish cat pictures from non-cat pictures, that's AI. And if we have "autocorrect on steroids" (credit to Dirk Hohndel) like ChatGPT, that matches the text comprehension skills of 15 year olds (just an example), then this too is AI.

One fundamental part of "intelligence" is being able to come up with independent thoughts. Another is to be able to think critically about those thoughts. LLMs cannot do either.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago

I was going to wholeheartedly endorse your comment and then you ruin it in the last sentence with

that matches the text comprehension skills of 15 year olds (just an example), then this too is AI.

It feels like you know what you are talking about, but then confuse the successful statistical analysis of text as "comprehension" which is just plain factually wrong.

sad. so close though.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Enjoy being downvoted for being right

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't care about votes. I just hope that people start to comprehend this field a tiny bit better .

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 0 points 3 days ago

They won’t, because their opinion is political and ideological, not technical