this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
450 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

73740 readers
4076 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
450
Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 days ago by florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Under what law?

Take it down act

On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including "digital forgeries" (i.e., deep fakes), in certain circumstances.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?

I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

you will have to directly regulate image generation

Its already being done to help prevent fake CSAM.

That should have been standard from the start.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone has any delusions that Twitter is private, not even DM's.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

It absolutely is private insofar as it is a channel between the software running on their end -> user who is operating the software. The lack of end to end encryption does not make it not private it makes it insecure which doesn't speak whatsoever to the issue raised which is that creation of an image by a user isn't likely to be considered publication until they share it.

It's highly probable that keeping people from generating deep fake nudes requires additional law.