this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
1511 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

73708 readers
3473 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If something's finally going to force the industry to curb its bullshit, this might just be it. Once you annoy normal people, it's all over. They seriously underestimate how many people would just stop using Spotify, or Youtube, or whatever other platform it is

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

While I want to agree. I feel like normal people are still not gonna give a shit.

[–] Balaquina@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They won't give a shit, but they're also lazy and won't bother setting up an account that requires ID and photo verification. Too much work. Maybe we'll even see somewhat of a recurrence of brick and mortar stores that sells music, movies, porn, etc.

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah the laziness to not even set up an account that needs it. I didn't consider that. Was more thinking of current users meeting the resistance.

[–] ElPsyKongroo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I tend to agree with you in that most people are too addicted to the convenience. But yeah, Balaquina does make a good point. After all, a commonly cited reason as for why the Fediverse won't rival mainstream sites is that making an account is more complex. Even then, it's just choosing an instance, which isn't that hard, it's just more complicated in comparison to, say, Reddit or Twitter. So following the same logic, it very well could backfire if Spotify raises the barrier of entry (or barrier of continuous entry, for those who already have accounts that they will have to verify).

[–] Iteria@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every company has learned that any friction to using your site is a bleed of customers. There are a lot of people who will just not use your site if it requires a lengthy validation process. If there was some kind of identity system that sites would integrate with like login.gov, then people would ignore this, but I don't think the UK has such a thing that every site can use, so a lot of people will not use the site and over time fall to piracy or illegitimate sites.

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Imagine if Spotify just opened the camera on your phone once a month when you first open the app that day. Just for like a split second. Theoretically it would be legal, for age verification. 🤮

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 0 points 2 days ago

People underestimate that most "regular" people are a product and exist for something other than humanity.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

It would have to get pretty bad before people would be willing to forgo convenience.

That stuff is a nasty drug, very addictive and people will sell everything they got to keep it. They'd rather pay and arm and a leg instead of learning a little technology so they could help themselves.

People will slave themselves to the company that lets them be the most ignorant person possible but still enjoy the fun of technology.

Could you imagine if all mobile devices stopped using face recognition to unlock phones? I'd be willing to bet that a big chunk of people wouldn't be able to use them at all. I'm surprised that google and apple haven't started charging extra for that.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

“Normal” people would put in their child’s social security number if it meant $2.99 off their subscription.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I'm not convinced. Look at how Netflix made bank on killing off "sharing is caring."

People are lazy, and if they want their easy Spotify fix, I fear they'll hand over their information and move on with their day.