this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
280 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

13455 readers
2937 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Your peers would know and they'd think you're pathetic. There'd be nothing to gain.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If grants are tied to the "score" there is an incentive to abuse the system.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago

True, but I feel like abuse would be fairly obvious and grant panels would know if someone is gaming the system. The panels, at least in my former field, are composed mostly of people who know who's doing what in their field. If they saw a high citation count they would know if that was legitimate. If anything, faking citations would be shameful and embarrassing for most people.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago

and similarly, any metric tied to a reward is no longer a metric worth measuring for the purposes of maintaining system health

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

On GitHub there is a tracker for how many commits you make in a year, but it's super easy to fake. But it's also pretty obvious when you fake it haha