this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
913 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24944 readers
2994 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://x.com/i/status/1948211079001051267

The GOP chair was caught off guard and scrambled—first delaying the vote, then trying to sabotage it by adding amendments to include Biden administration communications. Democrats called their bluff and agreed.

Then the GOP chair, Rep. Higgins, lied, claiming the motion FAILED until Rep. Robert Garcia forced a full roll call vote.

Ultimately, the vote passed 8-2 after 3 Republicans DEFIED their leadership and joined all 5 Democrats to pass the motion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 39 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I suspect a lot of the GOP also want rid of Trump now he's won for the second time.

They've put in their time. They're political lifers. They know they don't really need him any more, and frankly his health will take care of that sooner rather than later.

If he follows the rules, he can't run again anyway. If he doesn't then they don't need him to win elections for them, because there won't be any more. They're just stuffing their pockets while waiting for any opportunity to try and get in a bigger chair. Their only worry is that someday, lobbyists might not want to bribe them any more to do their jobs.

I suspect the list is being withheld for reasons other than Donald, who we all know is on it anyway. Plenty of more important shadowy figures who still have something to lose.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're still terrified of his rabid base and none of them have spines.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

They'll still obey the whip (because people that don't get deselected come election time), but they'll all be planning their next move once Trump is done.

The only loyalty among the rank and file is the fear of losing their jobs.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They want him to make it to Jan 21, 2027, then he can keel over. That way Vance can still qualify for two full terms afterward.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Vance doesn't even seem popular in his own family, let alone with the public at large.

Musk isn't allowed to run so they're all out of demagogues at this point, and their entire political strategy hinges on that. At some point they know they've got to shift back to pretending to be normal again. Their next candidate is going to be someone like Romney. They're going to lose all the crazies when they do, but chances are they'll just go back to not voting while hoarding bump stocks.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

"You won't need to vote"

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I broadly agree, but not sure I see a short term way back to winning as "normal again", the "crazies" induced the vast majority of the party to be sycophants to the crazy, and this hopefully alienated some moderates. Not sure who they might break out for 2028 if they do have an actual free election, but I could see them in a tough strategic spot trying to claim being moderate with the behavior of the party since 2016 and particularly since Trump's loss in 2020.

So they have a lack of a good fit for the Trump crazy but also the liability of having tried to be close with the crazy..

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I think the GOP media machine will continue to push more extreme candidates who are more akin to ramaswamy or some other techno-crat.

[–] Bubbey@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

I, among other people I know who voted for DT have absolutely zero interest in voting for JD. He's a Petey T puppet with the charisma of wet bread.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except Vance is a charisma vacuum.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

I mean yeah. That said, if the GOP seems to start shining that turd a bit later than this time next year, know that the plan is for Trump to learn the meaning of planned obsolescence.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I suspect a lot of the GOP also want rid of Trump

I suspect they don't actually care at all except the companies lobbying these particular representatives are being hurt by the tariffs.

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

They're republicans, no need to elaborate how awful they are.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There isn't a list of abusers. The only person the files have evidence of abuse is Epstein himself. Per multiple sources interviewed by the NY Times, the only lists in the files are victims and witnesses, and releasing the files would just victimize them again to doxxing. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/us/politics/epstein-files-trump-bondi-justice-department-fbi.html

Dems are jumping on the bandwagon because it distracts the Republicans from their rampage of destroying the foundations of our country, but the files themselves are a nothingburger as far any actual evidence of crimes.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The DOJ literally said Trump was named in the files.