politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
They even fucking lied?
I'm not holding my breath but I'm really hoping that will help maga chuds clue in that the GOP are wholly dishonest.
10% of them saying it was wrong is the best we'll get. Him being charged with treason is what it should be
Here's hoping that 10% are our fucking dipshit relatives eh?
It has to at least fall under this:
"§1001. Statements or entries generally Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749 ; Sept. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), 108 Stat. 2147 .)"
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=49&f=treesort&num=1262
If it has to be decided or enforced by the majority party or SCROTUS, then it’s not happening any time soon.
This won't even make the nightly news.
They don't care they just want to "win".
Actually they just want to "own the libs". They'll all scream to have the Epstein files released if you hint that AOC might be in there.
I hear she is. Release the files, and let's prove it.
Of course they want to "own the libs". They believe people get more conservative as they age, so kids have to be libs. And they definitely want to be able to own & trade children!
I get what you’re saying, but there are now two very distinct news spheres, and the one that they’re watching will simply not cover this story.
It's in the hands of r/conspiracy now...
I'm guessing Roberts Rules stuff.
As a quick and dirty thing, you can call a voice vote of ayes and nays. If it's not particularly close, it'll be obvious what the outcome is, the Chair will call the result, and everyone moves on. However, any member can call bullshit on the Chair, and then it goes to a more formal process.
So without watching the whole damn video, it's probably that the voice vote went one way, the Chair said it was the other, got called on it, and the roll call vote went against him.
2 people said 'nay' and 8 people said 'aye'... It was an honest mistake anyone could have made.
lol
But wasn't it one person + himself? :)
Obvs his nay own would sound louder to himself
Nah
I bet the voice vote was more like 5-5, and the Republicans changed when they knew their vote was being recorded.
Did you see the video? It was clear that the 'ayes' had it.
Oh, I didn't know the link would load without an account. You're right, it looks like nobody switched.
I did watch the video and it was blatant and ridiculous.
Decorum for thee but not for me.
Why does this have so many upvotes? I mean the information is mostly accurate, but for this particular 8-2 vote it sounds like it's just trying to make an excuse for the treasonous Higgins saying the vote failed.
Yes, definitely making excuses.
It's not making an excuse. It's explaining to people how he was able to lie. If it was an roll call vote it's next to impossible to lie about it, so it'd be confusing to some people who don't know how the process works. It's still blatant lying. It's just helping to educate people.
MAGAs can't resist cheating at every opportunity. Here we are again with standard election fraud on a micro basis, but we're supposed to believe that they won the 2024 Election "Fair & Square?"
This is unsurprising.
But forcing a recorded count does get those Republican Nays on record so they can be punished later.
I am puzzled by your incredulousness.
I am perplexed by your puzzlement.
It is rather quixotic.
Is that the right word?
I chose it for its pomposity. Seemed to gently fit the tone. 🤓