this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
682 points (89.6% liked)

Technology

73254 readers
4126 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (3 children)

A device that surreptitiously gathers information on a target is called a bug, not a feature.

[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

yup. how do people continue using Winblows :/

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -3 points 3 days ago

It's actually super simple: even though the community is called "Technology", there's A LOT of tech-illiterate fear mongering going on here. People behave like Microsoft is trying to spy on them, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Recall is:

  • only available on devices with an NPU.
  • local only, nothing goes out to the Internet (hence the NPU requirement).
  • opt-in - you need to turn it on yourself.

There's nothing malicious about it. Functionality is questionable, but acting like it's malware is just showing ignorance.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

~~Well, not really, a bug is unintentional. Even calling it a design flaw is a stretch, it's a feature that isn't for your benefit.~~

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Bug" also means "listening device."

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If it was intentional double entendre then I retract my comment, but used in the context of "bugs and features" there's a contextual implication.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

So, you're saying that browsing history, in literally any browser on the market, is a bug not a feature?

surreptitiously

Oh, wait, I actually missed that! How is something that you need to purposefully turn on "surreptitious"? Like... Holy fuck, people, this is supposed to be the community of tech-literate people, so maybe stop fear-mongering in read about Recall a bit? It's opt-in, it's limited to a (as of now) extremely small number of NPU-carrying devices, it's offline.

If you don't like it, just don't fucking turn it on.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a good thing that microsoft is trustworthy and you can believe everything they say. And that malware never misuses resources of the system on which it is installed.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Recall sits in a secure vault behind BitLocker encryption secured with Windows Hello.

BitLocker+Windows Hello gets broken through, the world has a much larger problem than some screenshots, because that's the foundation of, like, 80% of enterprise security.

If you're afraid that an attacker sits on your PC and just waits for you to unlock the vault, then you already have the PC breached to the point where they don't have to do that, they already have access to everything else.

If you're afraid of the feature in anyway, don't use it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You trust microsoft implicitly no matter what they do, I get it.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't. I read tech specs and security analyses. You just stick your head in the sand whenever someone says "Microsoft", though. It's silly.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't trust them and they have given me sufficient reason over the course of decades not to.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you still think it's 1990. Got it. Well, times have changed. We have better oversight. The EU has GDPR, user data is better protected. If they tried to pull off a "heist" and suddenly start grabbing these screenshots from users, the fine from EU would be historical.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

So you still think it’s 1990. Got it. Well, times have changed

Times may have. Microsoft has not.