this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
670 points (99.3% liked)

News

31049 readers
3425 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scytale@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah I didn’t really enjoy prim and proper corporate Colbert. His show was pretty mediocre. I believe it was also his decision to step away from his original persona and move on to a standard talk show host, so he actually wanted that change. Ferguson is still the GOAT for me.

[–] Wfh@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I miss Craig Ferguson so much!

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought it was because Comedy Central had a claimed trademark or something regarding the character he played, but it's been a while so I might be misremembering

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He didn’t want to mix the Colbert character with the Late Night show.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Irrelevant and refuted by Colbert's own words, but ok. Viacom quite literally wouldn't allow it.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/stephen-colbert-colbert-report-character-915236/

But on Wednesday night’s Late Show, the real Stephen Colbert indicated that Comedy Central’s legal team is barring his old character from appearing on CBS.

“This is true, immediately after that show, CBS’ top lawyer was contacted by the top lawyer for another company to say that the character Stephen Colbert is their intellectual property,” the real Stephen Colbert said on Wednesday.

He continued, “So it is with a heavy heart that I announce that thanks to corporate lawyers, the character Stephen Colbert, host of The Colbert Report, will never be seen again.”

The audience began to boo but the Late Show host insisted there was nothing he could do.

“I feel the same way, but what can I do? The lawyers have spoken. I cannot reasonably argue I own my face or name,” he said. “And as much as I’d like to have that guy on again, I can’t.”

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 0 points 19 hours ago

That refers to a bit he did with the Colbert character over a year into the run of the show. He has said in various interviews that he chose not to do the Late Show in any character because he felt he’d done that and it would be disrespectful to the franchise.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No way CBS would have allowed him to do the show in that character... Maybe a segment every now and then, but not entire episodes. Not on CBS.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He quite literally was legally disallowed by Viacom (Comedy Central' owners). Not CBS, where he told the audience he would love to bring the character back but was not legally allowed to do.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

It wouldn't have been the entire show.