this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
340 points (98.0% liked)

Games

40726 readers
1132 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Of course, that's why we need better guidelines. It's like beauty ads that have to declare they used Photoshop. Every photo is edited if you don't make it clear what you mean

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Why should something not be disclosed just because its common?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It builds indifference to the disclaimer when it's too general. The California cancer label is a good example.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But its not too general. Steam allows you to give a description of the use of AI

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago

The problem is you end up with the tag nonetheless.

The description doesn't apply to the label, no matter how much explanation you provide you're still going to devalue your game with the AI label so why would any developer admit to that?

The whole thing is just mind numbingly stupid.

Whoever thought this up needs to get out more and actually experience the human condition.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I didn't say that. It should be more specific to have any meaning to the consumer.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But it has meaning to some consumers. Not everyone can tell that an image has been majorly edited or created using a program created to replicate pictures

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You mean the idea that if wasn't created completely by people? It matters to you that some unpaid intern wasn't forced to work overtime writing the most boring bullshit scaffolding code?

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That kind of behavior should be disclosed too

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How do you people think games are made? The entire field is notorious for its working conditions

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

If its common, it doesnt mean that every game is made like that and because something is notorious, it doesnt mean everyone knows about it

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Because it becomes meaningless noise instead of useful information.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alarm_fatigue

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Even if it is ignored by a lot of people, its better than not knowing at all

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not saying there shouldn't be a disclosure, but an uncertain threshold that might be as low as "a developer accepted a copilot completion suggestion one time" isn't useful. You just end up with a prop65 situation where it's slapped on everything and basically meaningless.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Steam allows you to describe the use of AI

Also, if you know you are making a game for steam, why not just ignore the copilot suggestion? I dont think it will increase the time to make a game by that much time

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Okay great so I'll use AI to develop every aspect of my game and then just not declare it. After all, there's no enforcement so why wouldn't I do that?

The problem is the tag has literally no reason to exist, no one would admit to using AI even if they did so what the bloody hell was the point?

It's like you didn't even bother to read the Wikipedia article because it explains exactly why this sort of thing doesn't work

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Wouldnt the thing described in the wikipedia article not apply because of the description steam allows you to give and because 20% is not that high of a percentage?

Wouldnt the article linked on the post contradict your argument that there is no reason to add a way to disclose AI use because nobody is going to do that? There are a lot of games that admit to the use of AI

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because I don't think anybody actually cares that much if you use small pieces of AI code. What people don't want is everything being AI produced.

Right now though the AI tag is been applied to both scenarios with no distinction.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But there is a difference

Steam allows you to describe how you used AI

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Does it as far as I can tell if you have the tag you have the tag. There's no description next to it that says this guy used AI but only for irrelevant background stuff

[–] childOfMagenta@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I suspect the AI tag should apply to even more games then.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Hence the problem