this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
933 points (98.6% liked)
Political Memes
8907 readers
4266 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So he's afraid of being on it. That's all there is to this.
If I was afraid of being on a list, I would say nothing. Why draw attention to it??
Fame and fortune do not automatically grant a person good judgment. In fact, one could effectively argue that obtaining the former two frequently and demonstrably decreases whatever amount of the latter one may have had.
Or he's mocking the administration for insisting they had a list and suddenly heel turning on it. Given who he is, one of those is a bit more likely, don't you think?
King, an individual of wealth and status with known pedophilic tendencies (just take that scene from IT for example but there are plenty more throughout his works) and history of drug abuse, being involved with Epstein, the high profile individual who is now known for trafficking underage girls and party drugs to individuals of wealth and status, is not a far stretch to make.
Also, the way his tweet is phrased does not come off in any way as mocking the administration but instead feels to be mocking those who believe there exists documentation that exposes a list of individuals.
It could just be poor phrasing but, because of that, it is hella suspicious and given the extra context mentioned above makes it that much more.
I'm not saying that isn't true, but there was a time when I was 'caught up' on Stephen King novels for the most part, and I don't remember anything like that. The only ones I had skipped was "The Shining", "IT", and "Christine". I tried reading of them at one point and couldn't get into them. I stopped reading him I think it was around the time he started writing about Cell phones. Maybe a little before. I don't remember any pedophillic type stuff in any of his other novels. Could you tell me which books you are referencing?
I'm going to feel like an idiot if I've somehow missed something like this.
From a post on the other site:
@be_passersby
Yeah, a few.
Gross, yeah that's fucked up.
I didn't remember anything about that book other than it was a ghost story and thinking it wasn't good. It actually wasn't too long after that when I stopped reading him. When he wrote the second book about a scary car I figured he had said all he was going to say. I guess that was before the one about scary cell phones.
It sucks. People suck. I'm glad I stopped reading his books over a quarter century ago.
Go read threads deeper down this post, it is filled with examples.
King's pedophilic tendencies show in his unnecessarily sexualized descriptions of teenage characters. I specifically say unnecessary as sexualized language is just part and parcel of depicting scenes of sexual abuse and violence, and many of his works are touch on these topics. Most of it, though, is just "creepy and unnecessary", like his infatuation with detailed descriptions of their breasts, or just a sentence or two that is kinda cringe but can readily be passed over quickly.
Like in Carrie he writes at length on how smooth and attractive her legs are. In Under the Dome there is a paragraph that goes into unnecessary detail about a teenager girl's pubic hair. In his short story, The Jaunt, where a father is thinking about his children growing up at home without him; the boy is thought about as simply "going through puberty" whereas the thoughts about his daughter are about how she should be starting to develop breasts.
Another comment mentioned another short story where a daughter, now grown, dwells on her dad cumming with her in his lap during an eclipse when she was like 9, but they don't mention the name of the story.
Having written supremely fucked up content doesn't mean he has "known pedophilic tendencies". People have made assumptions about authors who wrote all forms of horror or produced other media because they are repulsed by the content of the media. As an example, Rob Zombie has made films about mass murder, rape, incest, and the guy is a friendly vegan.
Without knowing his intent, I think this is an example of poor phrasing. If anything that's supported by his later tweet:
Did Epstein traffic young girl(sic)? Yes, of course. Is there a client list? Doubtful. Conspiracy fodder.
Possible, but this is a time when it would have been better to mock the action rather than the existence.
For sure, but he doesn't exactly have to care if people read their own meaning into it instead of what he originally intended. I think it's telling where people's biases are if they assume he's a pedophile for a tweet like this. It's way more important to go after the real ones than the people who fail one person's personal purity test.
Well, it's not like I'm hiring a PI or anything. The only difference is whether or not I'll read his books. And since I believe strongly in the death of the author, and also in public libraries, he's not making any money off me either way.
I just think his post and the way he said it puts him in a very bad light. As an author, he should be better able to convey his tone.
Totally agree.