this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
172 points (99.4% liked)

World News

48460 readers
2135 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

France’s prime minister, François Bayrou, has proposed scrapping two public holidays as part of radical measures aimed at reducing the country’s ballooning deficit, boosting its economy and preventing it being “crushed” by debt.

Outlining the 2026 budget on Tuesday, Bayrou suggested Easter Monday and 8 May, when France commemorates Victory Day, marking the end of the second world war, although he said he was open to other options.

The centrist prime minister said: “The entire nation has to work more so that the activity of the country as a whole increases, and so that France’s situation improves. Everyone will have to contribute to the effort.”

France is under pressure to bring its public deficit, running at 5.8% of GDP, under the 3% figure required by EU rules, and to rein in €3.3tn of public debt – on which the annual interest, of €60bn, could soon become its biggest budget outlay.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a difference between having high marginal taxes on the rich, and actually collecting them

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you want France to have tax agents as effective as the IRS?

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm French. I want them 100 times more effective. You have no idea how much the rich French love tax optimization (and fraud -- it's been estimated to 100+ bn/year a few years ago).

The average fortune growth of the top 500 French families for the last 20 years is 14% a year. They can spare a dime.

Not to mention that I keep hearing stories about the IRS getting budget cuts. You guys just have a seemingly-mistaken impression that the IRS knows it all because they have citizens run the numbers while also doing the math themselves due to corporate lobbying from turbotax and the like, but it's actually a good thing when your tax office has good information. Y'all should concern yourselves with how politicians make them use it.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip -5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But they should reduce pensions because it only benefits older people who could be used for more research, defense and infrastructure.

If income increases, but you don't manage it well, the problem won't be solved.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah, so imagine. Wild idea here, we tax the rich. To increase the income of the government. Who can invest in the working and middle class, who can then have disposable income to stimulate the economy. Just a crazy theory I have there that has been shown to work every time it's been implemented. Crazy right? It's been 50 fucking years, it doesn't trickle down Reagan.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

why not just lift the age limit of pensions to 90, right?

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Originally, pensions were only meant to provide incentives, because many people didn't reach that age. Now that there are so many older retirees, it's becoming a burden that, if not addressed, will be catastrophic for the government.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

incentives for what? to pay taxes? are you implying that pension should go back to be a big scam on society?

the solution is certainly not to abolish the pension system. nobody wants to work when they can barely anymore, and this is not frostpunk or something to justify that.

of course, the money could go to wherever else to increase efficiency, or whatever. but hopefully the goal is not to make the most efficient society, where the "uncapable" (and also the non-exploitable-anymore) are left to suffer and die, but the most human society. otherwise we could just defund healthcare, all kinds of aids too, because they are just taking away resources from The Capables, right?

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago

No, rather, a new solution must be found. Because the demographic pyramids have been inverted, which has made pensions a problem for government finances.

We have time to maneuver, but if this isn't resolved, we'll reach the point where we'll prioritize the Capable and leave the Incapable to chance.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That is absolutely not true and just part of the red-pills psyop to radicalise young men, who don't actually understand what the welfare state is, or why it's important. Kindly go listen to Joe Rogan on your next jog off a cliff.