221
Scientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviews
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
221 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
72774 readers
2548 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't see this as rotten behaviour at all, I see it as a Bobby tables moment teaching an organisation relying on a technology that they better have a their ducks in a row.
It's still extremely shitty unethical behavior in my book since the negative impact is not felt by the organization that's failing to validate their inputs, but your peers who are potentially being screwed out of a review process and a spot in a journal or conference
Absolutely. If they don't care to actually read the texts, they have to accept the risks of not reading it.
Por qué no los dos?
It's an XKCD comic.
They didn't ask what the comic was, they asked "but why not both?". It can be both unethical and a lesson