this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
243 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

72745 readers
1361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s more cost effective to integrate the controller.

Being worse for customers is just a happy accident.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You and I both know that Apple doesnt do this shit for cost efficiency.

They do it to make make shit worse for consumers and "unauthorized" repair services.

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago

They’re a business. Reducing their costs (while charging you a premium) is absolutely what they do.

Apple’s whole deal for decades now has been building a vertical supply chain. Using their own SSD controller is one less component they have to pay others for.

They just don’t give a shit about downsides: aftermarket repairers or user upgradeability.