this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1490 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

8791 readers
2944 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is that garbage Pew report from

… 8,942 U.S. citizens ages 18 and older who are members of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP). We verified their turnout in the five general elections from 2016 to 2024 using commercial voter files that collect publicly available official state turnout records.

It’s bullshit and the reason why is right there - and the fact that they ran the survey two weeks after the election. Idiocy.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You care to support your unfounded assertions? Two weeks is still pretty close to the election. You can only do so much on day-of exit polls. Two weeks later is very close to the election. And you quoted a paragraph, but I see nothing actual objectionable there. What exactly is your problem with anything you quoted? That's a very large sample size. You're just dismissing the study's methodology as "bullshit" by fiat. It's bullshit because you arbitrarily decided it was bullshit. Or more precisely, it's simply bullshit because you didn't like the conclusions reached. Blue MAGA indeed.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I do not. They are far from unfounded.

I see nothing actual objectionable there.

I’m sure.