this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
1033 points (99.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

2926 readers
526 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Words matter.

You aren't writing an academic paper. Always use simple direct language.

  • Help the poor
  • Healthcare for everyone
  • Good treatment at work.

Don't use complex words.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pendorilan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Do parapelegics require "temporary support"? There are some people who need continual support and they're always going to exist in any society. Disabled people. And they aren't a "systemic problem".

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

there are governmental systems that would disagree on that last point.

[–] Pendorilan@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

And they would be immoral and evil if they suggest letting disabled people die off. Yes, I know about Libertarians and their selfish, egotistical, unempathetic views towards people less well off than they are. Anyone who believes "every man, woman, and child for themselves" is how a society should function is a piece of shit, sorry. And obviously you can lump Conservatives in with them on this issue too.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -3 points 10 hours ago

I could see a religions having a belief that being burdensome is a fate worse than death and a government then mandating that religion. Which admittedly goes against human rights, but is done in a few countries.